Six friends were on a large sail boat far out to sea. They had the usual safety gear on board, including an inflatable life raft and personal flotation vests (life jackets). They decided to go for a swim in the calm waters, and one by one jumped over the edge. One had a plastic float toy, another a diving mask, and only one was wearing a life jacket. One man was wearing denim shorts with a knife on the belt, and the rest simply had on their swim suits. You may recognize this as a movie which was supposedly based on a true story.
They realized too late that nobody had put the ladder down. The sides of the boat were smooth polished fiberglass and sloped out over their heads. It was at least six feet up to the railing. They tried jumping high enough, but soon they were tired and cold. A breeze blew a jacket to the edge above, and a sleeve hung low enough that one of the men was able to grab it and pull the nylon jacket into the water with them. There was no land in sight. What could they do to save themselves?
The More Obvious Solutions
As mentioned, they tried jumping out of the water to reach the railing. As I recall, a couple of them even tried lifting another up, but they sunk into the water as they lifted her. Those, and swimming around the boat to see if there was anything hanging down to climb up on, were what I would consider the expected responses.A bit more creative, although still a fairly "linear" solution, was to use their swim suits, and the jacket tie to create a "rope" that could be thrown up to the railing. Once tangled or caught on the railing, it could then be climbed. In the movie, it took them hours to think of this, and after one attempt during which the clothing broke halfway through the climb, they gave up, as people strangely do in movies.
The More "Lateral Thinking" Examples
Lateral thinking, remember, is moving away from the usual logic and linear line of reasoning. For example, it is logical to think about jumping up to reach the railing, and to help a person do that. A more creative or lateral approach would be to question the logic of using people as "muscle" for this attempt. What else could they be? Flotation.One man could have leaned over and held his hands on his knees to provide a platform (his back) for another to climb on. Meanwhile, the others could each take a deep breath and swum down under the first to provide more flotation. They could have held the inflatable toy and life jacket under there as well. This might have kept the "platform" man floating high enough for the climber to stand on and reach the railing.
Lateral thinking, then, is sometimes about using what you have in unexpected ways. The knife, for example, might be used more conventionally to cut strips from the clothing and webbing from the life jacket to make a rope - not a bad idea either. But a more "lateral" though is for a man to pound it into the hull of the boat and use it to hang from while the lightest woman climbs over him to the railing.
But to think in lateral or non-linear ways also means to challenge the whole line of thought that the pursuit of a solution is based on. In this case, that line of thought is that they had to get back on the boat. Of course it is natural to think that is the only way to survive, but what if it wasn't? What if they don't actually need the boat?
Those kind of questions can sometimes lead to the most creative solutions. In this case, for example, had they challenged their assumption that the boat was so important, this lateral thinking may have lead to a very creative solution: Use the knife to cut a hole in the hull and sink the boat. As the boat got lower, they could have scrambled aboard and retrieved the life raft and supplies before it sank completely.
| |
The book store owner used one book to destroy thousands of others - all in one day. How did he do this? A lateral thinking puzzle like this relies on setting your thoughts in a certain direction. In this case, the idea of a "book store owner" encourages you assume that a book one reads was used to destroy the others. Drop that assumption and you might find the solution - the man used a book of matches to burn all the other books.
Puzzles of this type are good mental exercise, and fun, but fortunately not all lateral thinking problems are word play or simple riddles. In fact, many are designed to require or encourage creative thinking in ways more applicable to actual situations. This type often has many solutions which are valid.
Some may not like the inconclusive nature of this kind of puzzle or problem. They want one definitive solution, so they know they're "right" once they have an answer. However, these more open-ended lateral thinking problems are just as good for exercising one's creativity, and the thinking skills developed from working on them may be more applicable to everyday life, where there is rarely one definitive solution to a problem.
Situational Thinking Problems
This type usually involves a scenario or situation which is explained, along with a goal. Suppose, for example, you need to get a basketball out of a 12-foot deep pit. That's the goal. The situation? The pit has smooth cement for the floor and walls, and it is square, about four feet per side. You're alone and have only what you are wearing, including whatever is in your pockets at the moment. How can you get the basketball out using only what has been described?Like any good lateral thinking problem this requires you to think "laterally," which means coming at the problem from other angles, as opposed to the more traditional linear or logical way. You have to use what you have, but in ways that these things are not normally used.
You might, for example, make a "basket" out of your t-shirt, tying your shoelaces to it around the edges. Unravel the threads from your socks and you can make a string to lower the "basket." Then move the basketball onto it and then pull it up to you. A shoe hung on the end of a string made of strips of clothing might work to "kick" the ball into place, rolling it onto your shirt.
| |
Of course, life itself presents us with many lateral thinking problems, if we approach situations creatively. A judge in a Michigan child custody case could have followed the traditional thinking about how much time the children would spend at each parent's place, but he ruled that the children would stay right where they were in the home they knew. The parents would each get their own place and move in with the kids on alternating weeks. Now that's a good example of applying lateral thinking to real life problems.


